• Home
  • Insights
    • About Customer Insight
    • Ad Hoc Poll Results
    • Customer Insight
    • Green
    • Musings
    • Research Statistics
    • Top Performers
    • 495
    • RSS Feeds
  • Mobile UC
    • Mobile UC Business
    • Mobile UC Observations
    • Mobile UC Product Reviews
    • Mobile UC Service Reviews
    • Mobile UC Applications Reviews
    • Mobile UC Devices Reviews
  • Coms
    • IP Video
      • Video Conferencing Consultants
      • Telepresence Consultants
      • Video Conferencing Strategy
    • Applications
    • E911
    • Email
    • LANs & WANs
    • Messaging
    • Quality
    • Security
    • SIP
    • VoIP
    • VoIP History
  • Scores
  • Reports
    • Register?
      • Be Heard. Join our Panel.
      • Prize Winners Do Surveys
      • Unregister
    • Research Catalogs
    • Recovery Series
    • Collaboration
      • Exchange Review
    • Fundamentals
    • Messaging
    • Mobile UC
      • Alcatel-Lucent Users
      • Avaya Users
      • Cisco Users
      • Nortel Users
      • Product Manager's Guide
      • Siemens Users
    • Web 2.0
    • Pre-2007 Research
    • Comments
    • Brainshark Content Network
  • About
    • About Peter Brockmann
    • Contact Us
    • News
    • In the News...
    • Request a User Briefing
    • Request a Vendor Briefing
    • Full Disclosure Notice
    • Famous Brockmann's
  • David
Coms Email The Importance of Responding

The Importance of Responding

Monday, 16 July 2007 03:00 Written by Peter Brockmann
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 

Every now and then I read print magazines (actually I read them all the time, but only occasionally do I blog about them).

Sales & Marketing Management had a nice article about research that Scott Hornstein had done where his firm sends a one line email to the Financial Times World's Most Admired Companies.

To: customerservice (at) COMPANY.com

Subject: Customer Service

Body: What is your corporate policy regarding the turnaround time for emails addressed to customer service? 

Here are two highlights reported in Sales & Marketing Management magazine:

  • 33% answered within 24 hours, down from 63% in 2002
  • 51% answered, down from 86% in 2002 

 


I sent Scott an email as follows:

To: edit (at) sales&marketing.com

Subject: Return to Sender:

Hi:

this is in reference to 'The Big Picture' by Scott Hornstein in July/August 2007 issue.

In research that my organization published last month on "The Problem with Email", email is very important to the success of 83% of the over 540 businesses surveyed. Yet, users are deluged with irrelevant, inappropriate, anonymous bulk messages (aka sp&m*) even though the vast majority of organizations have some anti-sp&m technology in place. Sp&m is the third most frequent source of email - after treatment too! As your study shows, the effectiveness of email service may also be in question as well as the effectiveness of the customer service departments.

36% of our respondents' companies have lost business because some email did not arrive, and at least once a week ask or are asked to resend a message that didn't arrive. We know that the email network is reliable, yet the messages aren't getting through and as your study shows, aren't getting back.

I suspect your customer service test message was likely trapped in the junk folder of some well-meaning email hygiene filter, or was not discernible among the thousands of nasty messages in the inbox or junk folder.

Our conclusion is that email filtering technology is getting in the way of the services' ability to effect business. There are alternatives.

You can check out our findings at http://www.brockmann.com.

* BTW, I've spelt that word that way because many filtering technologies consider the use of that word a 'sp&mmy' offense and therefore toss it into the junk folder.

-- Peter

-- This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

-- Brockmann & Company | www.brockmann.com

-- +1-508-904-0171

"In God we trust; all others bring data." Dr W. Edwards Deming

< Prev   Next >

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Send
Cancel
JComments

On average, video conferences are 25% shorter than face-to-face meetings.

The Perfect Storm

Login

  • Forgot your password?
  • Forgot your username?
Follow us on Twitter

Posts: All-Time Highest Rated

  • Why Register?
  • Guest Blog: Convincing Business Leaders About The Green Value of Their Low-Carbon Products
  • Internet on Us
  • 10 Most Popular Blog Entries of 2009
  • Brockmann Guest Blogs for No Jitter
  • Cisco Cius
  • Swatting Is a New Dangerous Sport
  • Cost Saving Strategies: Why Video Managed Services?
  • Identity Thieves Masquerade as Job Sites
  • Video Conferencing Consultants

Posts: Year's Most Popular

  • Why Register?
  • Mobile Apps Are Addictive
  • Now, I Have Seen It All
  • Taxes and Telecommuting
  • Breaking News - Avaya to IPO
  • Android Users Suffer Security Problems
  • Google Removes More Mal-Apps
  • Innovations in Screen Technologies
  • Applying Email Marketing Features to Personal Email
  • Where Have I Been?

Reports: All-Time Most Popular

  • Forums in Small Companies
  • Forums in Large Companies
  • The Problem With Email
  • Video Communications 2.0: Tips for Improving The Experience
  • The Manager's Recession Survival Guide video

Reports: Year's Most Popular

(c) Brockmann & Company 2002-2011 Scroll To Top